Blood in the Batteries: The Tragic Cost of Child Exploitation in Our Renewable Energy Revolution
By: Emancip8 Project
Blood in the Batteries offers an in-depth exploration of the complex and troubling issue of child labor in the cobalt mining industry in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which is integral to the production of rechargeable batteries for renewable energy devices. The book examines various aspects, including the hazardous working conditions in mines, the socio-economic factors driving child labor, and the environmental impact of mining. It critically evaluates the roles and responsibilities of multinational corporations, consumers, governments, and international organizations in perpetuating or combating these human rights abuses. It discusses ongoing efforts to reform the industry and proposes solutions, such as ethical sourcing standards, supply chain transparency, alternative technologies, and consumer activism, to address these systemic issues and move towards a more responsible and sustainable use of cobalt in our renewable energy transition.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Blood in The Batteries Renewable Energy — Our world is increasingly reliant on technology, from smartphones to electric cars. At the heart of these technological advancements lies a mineral that is critical to their functionality: cobalt. Cobalt is a key component of the rechargeable batteries that power our devices and vehicles, making it an essential resource for our modern society.
However, the journey of cobalt from the mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to our hands is fraught with tragedy and exploitation. In the cobalt mines of the DRC, children as young as six years old work in dangerous conditions, risking their lives to extract this valuable mineral. The profits from this mining often fund armed conflict, perpetuating a cycle of violence and poverty.
This book, “Blood in the Batteries: The Tragic Cost of Child Exploitation in Our Renewable Energy Revolution,” is an intentionally short, to-the-point, comprehensive examination of the human cost of cobalt mining in the DRC. It explores the lives of the children and families impacted by this industry, the economic and political structures that allow for this exploitation to continue, and the role of consumers and corporations in perpetuating this system.
Through interviews with survivors, experts, and industry insiders, this book sheds light on the realities of cobalt mining in the DRC and its impact on those who are most vulnerable. It challenges readers to confront the uncomfortable truth that the products we rely on every day may be tainted with the blood and sweat of exploited children.
But this book is not just about exposing the problems of cobalt mining. It also offers a path forward, highlighting the efforts of those working to create ethical and sustainable cobalt mining practices. It calls on consumers, corporations, and governments to take action to support these efforts and to demand a world where the energy we use is not built on the backs of exploited children.
As we continue our renewable energy revolution, we must ask ourselves: at what cost? This book provides a compelling answer to that question and serves as a call to action for us all.
Chapter 1: The Devil's Metal: The Story of Cobalt and its Importance in Renewable Energy Technology
In the race to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy, the global demand for cobalt has surged. Cobalt is a critical component of rechargeable batteries, which power electric vehicles, laptops, smartphones, and other devices that we rely on daily. This little-known metal is now central to the renewable energy revolution, but at what cost?
Cobalt is predominantly mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which accounts for over 60% of the world’s cobalt production. (U.S. Geological Survey, 2022). The cobalt industry in the DRC is dominated by artisanal and small-scale mining, often conducted under hazardous and exploitative conditions. Children as young as six years old are known to work in cobalt mines, often forced to undertake hazardous tasks, such as digging and carrying heavy loads, without protective equipment or appropriate training. (Amnesty International, 2020).
According to a report by Human Rights Watch, environmental pollution from artisanal cobalt mining is rife, with miners, their families, and local communities at risk of exposure to toxic metals such as cobalt, lead, and arsenic. Water sources and farmland are often contaminated, and the health impacts of such pollution are severe and long-lasting. (Roche et. al., 2021).
The DRC’s cobalt industry is complex, with multiple layers of actors involved in the supply chain, from the miners at the bottom to the multinational corporations at the top. The lack of regulation and oversight in the DRC has allowed for widespread exploitation, with miners paid a pittance for their labor, while the profits from cobalt sales are enjoyed by those further up the supply chain.
Cobalt has become a “devil’s metal” in the renewable energy revolution, with the demand for cobalt outpacing the capacity to ethically and sustainably mine it. The global reliance on cobalt from the DRC has fueled the continued exploitation of children and communities, as well as environmental degradation. The true cost of this so-called green energy revolution is the blood of Congolese children and their families, who are trapped in a cycle of poverty and exploitation.
As we move forward in our quest for renewable energy, it is imperative that we confront the dark reality of the cobalt industry in the DRC and seek more ethical and sustainable sources of this vital metal. We must acknowledge the true cost of the “green” revolution and take concrete steps to prevent further harm to those at the bottom of the supply chain. The fate of the planet and its people is inextricably linked, and we cannot achieve a sustainable future at the expense of vulnerable communities and their human rights.
Chapter 2: The Cobalt Rush: The Rise of Cobalt Mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has long been known for its rich mineral reserves, including cobalt, which is crucial for the production of rechargeable batteries, such as those used in mobile devices and electric vehicles. The demand for cobalt has surged in recent years due to the renewable energy revolution, which has led to an increase in the number of electric vehicles and a growing need for energy storage.
This surge in demand has led to a “cobalt rush” in the DRC, with a significant increase in the number of artisanal and small-scale mining operations. Artisanal and small-scale mining account for a significant portion of the cobalt supply chain in the DRC, with estimates suggesting that up to 20% of cobalt production comes from these informal operations. (Roche & Jowitt, 2020).
The rapid expansion of the cobalt mining sector in the DRC has led to significant environmental and social impacts. The informal nature of many mining operations means that there are few regulations or protections in place for workers or the environment. In addition, the high demand for cobalt has driven up prices, making it an attractive target for criminal groups and armed militias who seek to control the trade.
Child labor is a significant problem in the cobalt mining sector in the DRC, with estimates suggesting that tens of thousands of children work in mines across the country. Children as young as six years old are known to work in cobalt mines, often in hazardous and dangerous conditions. These children are at risk of injury, illness, and even death, and are often paid very low wages or not at all.
The growth of the cobalt mining sector in the DRC has also led to significant environmental impacts, including deforestation, soil erosion, and water pollution. Mining operations generate large quantities of waste, which can contaminate waterways and harm local communities. (Schüler et. al., 2011).
Despite the significant environmental and social impacts of cobalt mining in the DRC, efforts to address these issues have been slow and uneven. There have been some efforts by companies and industry groups to improve working conditions and reduce environmental impacts, but progress has been limited. The lack of transparency and accountability in the cobalt supply chain makes it difficult to track the origin of cobalt and ensure that it has been produced in a responsible and sustainable manner. (OECD, 2019).
In summary, the cobalt rush in the DRC has led to a significant increase in cobalt production but has also resulted in significant environmental and social impacts, including child labor, environmental degradation, and human rights violations. The global demand for cobalt means that these issues are unlikely to be resolved soon, and urgent action is needed to ensure that the production of cobalt is sustainable, responsible, and ethical.
Chapter 3: The Exploited Children: The Reality of Child Labor in Congo's Cobalt Mines
Congo’s cobalt mines are notorious for exploiting children. The cobalt industry, fueled by the increasing demand for renewable energy technologies, has been a breeding ground for child labor. Despite international regulations and corporate social responsibility commitments, the harsh reality of child exploitation in Congo’s cobalt mines remains unchanged.
Child labor in Congo’s cobalt mines is a complex issue that cannot be easily addressed. The cobalt industry is deeply entrenched in the socioeconomic fabric of the country, and the demand for cobalt continues to rise. Many families see no other option but to send their children to work
in the mines to supplement their income. The children are often forced to work in dangerous conditions, with no protective gear or safety training, and for long hours. They are exposed to physical injuries, respiratory problems, and long-term health effects from exposure to toxic chemicals.
The use of child labor in cobalt mining violates international human rights law, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Labour Organization’s conventions. Despite this, the cobalt industry continues to operate with little regard for the welfare of these children. (International Labour Organization, 2017).
The situation is further complicated by the lack of transparency in the cobalt supply chain. (Blore, 2014). Cobalt is often mined by artisanal miners, who work independently and are not affiliated with any formal organization. These miners sell their cobalt to intermediaries, who then sell it to smelters and refineries. The cobalt is eventually sold to technology companies that use it to manufacture batteries and other components. This opaque supply chain makes it difficult to trace the origin of the cobalt and ensure that it was not mined using child labor.
To address the issue of child labor in Congo’s cobalt mines, it is essential to tackle the root causes of the problem. This includes improving access to education and alternative livelihoods for families in mining communities. It also requires greater transparency and accountability in the cobalt supply chain. Technology companies must take responsibility for the sourcing of their cobalt and work to ensure that it is mined responsibly and without the use of child labor. (Vogel, 2006).
In conclusion, the reality of child labor in Congo’s cobalt mines is a tragic consequence of the demand for renewable energy technologies. The use of child labor in cobalt mining violates international human rights law and perpetuates a cycle of poverty and exploitation. It is up to all stakeholders, including governments, corporations, and consumers, to take action and ensure that the cobalt industry operates ethically and without exploiting children.
Chapter 4: A Tarnished Future: The Lasting Impact of Cobalt Mining on Congo's Environment
The extraction of cobalt from the mines of the Democratic Republic of Congo has not only been a source of human exploitation but also environmental degradation. The toxic and hazardous chemicals used in the extraction process have been a significant cause of air, water, and soil pollution, affecting both the miners and the surrounding communities. In this chapter, we will delve into the environmental impact of cobalt mining in Congo, its long-lasting effects, and the inadequate response of both the Congolese government and international corporations.
One of the main environmental issues associated with cobalt mining is water pollution. The mining process uses large quantities of water to wash the extracted ore, and the waste containing toxic chemicals is discharged into the water bodies. (Roche et. al., 2017). This leads to the contamination of the rivers and groundwater, affecting aquatic life and the people who depend on these water sources. Polluted water is not only harmful to the environment but also to human health, causing skin irritations, respiratory problems, and other chronic illnesses.
Apart from water pollution, cobalt mining also contributes significantly to air pollution. The dust and fumes generated during the mining process contain harmful particles such as silica and sulfur dioxide, which pose a severe health risk to the miners and nearby residents. Exposure to these pollutants can lead to lung diseases, including silicosis and tuberculosis, and other respiratory problems. (Gottesfeld & Andrew, 2018).
Moreover, cobalt mining has led to deforestation and soil degradation in Congo. The forest cover around the mining sites has been cleared to make way for the mining infrastructure, leading to a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. The soil around the mining areas has been contaminated with toxic chemicals and heavy metals, rendering it unfit for agriculture, and affecting the livelihoods of the surrounding communities. (Zhang et. al., 2019).
Despite the long-term environmental and health impacts of cobalt mining, the Congolese government has failed to regulate mining activities effectively. There are inadequate environmental protection laws and regulations, and the government’s oversight is weak. The international corporations that buy cobalt have also failed to take adequate measures to ensure responsible mining practices. Many of these corporations’ source cobalt from Congo without due diligence or accountability, ignoring human rights and environmental concerns.
In conclusion, the environmental impact of cobalt mining in Congo is significant and long-lasting. The lack of proper regulations and oversight from the government and the inadequate response from international corporations have exacerbated the situation. To address this issue, there is a need for effective regulations, international accountability, and responsible mining practices that prioritize human rights and environmental sustainability. Failure to take these steps will only result in a tarnished future for Congo and the planet.
Chapter 5: The Corporate Responsibility Conundrum: Who is Responsible for the Abuse of Child Labor in Cobalt Mining?
The use of child labor in cobalt mining is an issue that has gained significant attention in recent years. (Amnesty International, 2016). The Congolese government has been criticized for failing to regulate the mining industry, and the international community has called on companies that use cobalt in their products to take responsibility for the conditions under which the mineral is extracted.
The question of corporate responsibility in the exploitation of child labor in cobalt mining is a complex one. On the one hand, companies argue that they cannot be held responsible for the actions of their suppliers. They argue that they have no control over the conditions under which cobalt is mined and that it is the responsibility of the Congolese government to regulate the industry.
On the other hand, some argue that companies have a moral and ethical responsibility to ensure that the products they sell are not tainted by the exploitation of children. They argue that companies should take steps to investigate their supply chains and ensure that their suppliers are not using child labor.
The issue of corporate responsibility is further complicated by the fact that many companies do not know where their cobalt comes from. The supply chains for cobalt are long and complex, with the mineral passing through multiple intermediaries before it reaches the end user. (Banza Lubaba Nkulu et. al., 2018). Companies often rely on their suppliers to provide information about the origins of their cobalt, but this information is often incomplete or unreliable.
In recent years, there have been efforts to increase transparency in the cobalt supply chain. The Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), for example, is a multi-stakeholder initiative that seeks to promote the responsible sourcing of minerals, including cobalt. The RMI has developed a standard for responsible cobalt sourcing and provides a framework for companies to assess the risks in their supply chains and take action to address them.
Some companies have taken steps to address the issue of child labor in their supply chains. Apple, for example, has published a list of its cobalt suppliers and has required them to comply with its supplier code of conduct. Tesla has also taken steps to address the issue, including entering into a partnership with Glencore, a major cobalt producer, to ensure responsible sourcing of the mineral. (Apple Inc., 2023).
However, many other companies have been slow to take action. Some argue that the issue of child labor in cobalt mining is too complex and that there are no easy solutions. Others argue that the cost of ensuring responsible sourcing is too high and that it would make their products too expensive for consumers.
In conclusion, the issue of corporate responsibility in the exploitation of child labor in cobalt mining is a complex one. While some companies have taken steps to address the issue, many others have been slow to act. As consumers become more aware of the issue, they are increasingly demanding that companies take responsibility for the conditions under which their products are produced. The challenge now is for companies to find ways to ensure responsible sourcing of cobalt that is economically viable and sustainable in the long term.
Chapter 6: The Promise of Reform: Efforts to Combat Child Labor in Cobalt Mines
The child labor crisis in cobalt mining is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. International organizations, governments, NGOs, and companies are working to combat the problem through a variety of initiatives and programs. While progress has been made, much work remains to be done to ensure that the exploitation of children in cobalt mines is eradicated.
One approach to addressing child labor in cobalt mining is through supply chain traceability. The aim is to ensure that the cobalt used in technology products does not come from mines that employ child labor. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has been working with companies to develop supply chain due diligence mechanisms to identify and eliminate child labor from the cobalt supply chain. Companies such as Apple and Tesla have committed to using only ethically sourced cobalt in their products. (Apple, 2020).
Another initiative is the development of responsible sourcing standards for cobalt. (Responsible Minerals Initiative, 2022). The Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) has developed a standard for cobalt that includes requirements for child labor prevention and mitigation. The RMI provides tools and resources for companies to implement the standard in their supply chains. The standard has been adopted by major companies such as Microsoft and HP.
In addition, some NGOs are working directly with communities in cobalt mining regions to provide education and support for children and families. The International Labour Organization (ILO) has partnered with local organizations in the Democratic Republic of Congo to provide vocational training and education for children who have been removed from the mines. The ILO is also working to improve working conditions in the mines to reduce the need for child labor.
Governments can also play a critical role in addressing child labor in cobalt mining. In 2018, the Democratic Republic of Congo passed a law that increased the penalties for using child labor in mines. (Democratic Republic of Congo, 2018). The law also established a system for identifying and removing children from the mines and providing them with education and support. However, enforcement of the law remains a challenge, and corruption in the mining industry continues to be a major obstacle to progress.
Efforts to combat child labor in cobalt mining are still in their early stages, and much remains to be done to ensure that progress is sustained. The complexity of the issue requires a coordinated approach that involves all stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, and companies. Only through sustained and focused efforts can the exploitation of children in cobalt mines be eliminated and a brighter future for the children of the Democratic Republic of Congo be secured.
Chapter 7: The Struggle for Fair Wages: The Plight of Cobalt Miners and Their Families
While child labor in cobalt mining in the Congo has received significant attention, the struggle for fair wages and better working conditions for adult miners and their families has largely gone unnoticed. Cobalt mining is a dangerous and difficult job, yet miners and their families often receive little compensation for their labor.
One reason for this is the complexity of the supply chain. Cobalt is a globally traded commodity, and the demand for it has increased dramatically in recent years due to its use in rechargeable batteries for electric vehicles, smartphones, and other electronics. (Broom, 2020). However, the prices paid for cobalt are often set far away from the mines themselves, and the miners and their communities have little bargaining power in the global market.
Furthermore, many of the mining operations in the Congo are informal and unregulated, leaving workers vulnerable to exploitation by middlemen and traders who purchase the cobalt from the miners at low prices and sell it to larger companies for a profit. This lack of transparency and regulation makes it difficult to hold anyone accountable for unfair labor practices.
The working conditions in cobalt mines are also concerning. The mining process is labor-intensive and involves dangerous and unhealthy practices such as hand-digging in narrow tunnels, working with primitive tools, and using harsh chemicals. The risk of injury or illness is high, and miners often work long hours in difficult conditions without adequate protective gear. (Amnesty International, 2016).
In addition, the poverty that many miners and their families face mean that they have little choice but to accept the low wages and poor working conditions. The promise of a job in the mines, no matter how dangerous or exploitative, maybe the only option for many people in the region.
Efforts to improve working conditions and wages in the cobalt mines have been slow and difficult. (Moyo, 2019). Some companies have started to take steps to ensure that their supply chains are free of child labor and human rights abuses, but the broader issue of fair wages and better working conditions for adult miners remains largely unaddressed.
One possible solution is to increase the transparency of the supply chain and provide better information about where cobalt is sourced from and how much is paid to the miners. This would help to create a more equitable market and give miners and their communities greater bargaining power.
Another solution is to invest in alternative livelihoods and economic opportunities for communities in the region so that people are not forced to rely on the cobalt mines for their livelihoods. This would require significant investment in education, infrastructure, and job creation, but could ultimately help to break the cycle of poverty and exploitation in the region.
In conclusion, the struggle for fair wages and better working conditions for cobalt miners and their families in the Congo is a complex and difficult issue that requires the attention and action of companies, governments, and civil society. The continued exploitation of workers in the Cobalt mines is a stain on the renewable energy revolution, and we must do better to ensure that the transition to a clean energy future is not built on the backs of vulnerable and exploited workers.
Chapter 8: Blood on Our Hands: The Consumers' Complicity in Cobalt Exploitation
As consumers, we often take for granted the products we use and the luxuries they provide us. The phones we rely on, the laptops we work on, and the electric cars we drive are just a few examples of the many technological advancements that have made our lives easier and more efficient. However, as we revel in the convenience of our devices, we must also recognize the human cost behind their production.
In the case of cobalt, a mineral essential to the production of rechargeable batteries, the cost has been devastatingly high. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) produces over 60% of the world’s cobalt, and the majority of this cobalt is extracted by artisanal and small-scale miners, often working in dangerous and hazardous conditions, including children. (Roche & Jowitt, 2020). These workers are exploited for their labor, paid low wages, and exposed to serious health risks, such as respiratory issues and chronic pain, due to their work in the mines.
While we may not see the direct impact of our consumer choices, we are indirectly complicit in this exploitation. The global demand for cobalt, driven by our increasing dependence on technology, has led to a race for cheaper and more accessible cobalt, often at the expense of the workers who produce it. As consumers, we have the power to demand that companies take responsibility for the supply chain of their products and ensure that no child labor or exploitation is used in the production of the materials they use.
One example of this is the “Know Your Source” initiative launched by Tesla, one of the world’s largest producers of electric cars. (Tesla, Inc., 2020). The initiative aims to increase transparency in the supply chain of their products, including cobalt, and ensure that they are sourcing their materials responsibly and ethically. Similarly, the Responsible Cobalt Initiative, a multi-stakeholder initiative, aims to create a responsible supply chain for cobalt, with the ultimate goal of eliminating child labor and exploitation. (Responsible Cobalt Initiative, 2019).
However, these efforts are not enough. As consumers, we must also demand change from the companies we buy from and the governments that regulate them. We must ask ourselves if we are willing to continue using products that are tainted by the blood of child labor and exploitation.
It is time for us to take responsibility for our consumption choices and demand that the companies we rely on do the same. By advocating for ethical and responsible supply chains, we can ensure that our technological advancements are not made at the cost of human lives. It is time to stop turning a blind eye to the human cost of our consumerism and start taking action to make a change.
Chapter 9: Green Energy's Dark Secret: The Irony of Renewable Energy's Dependence on Child Exploitation
The rise of renewable energy has been touted as the solution to the world’s energy crisis and a path toward a cleaner future. However, the irony of this “green” revolution is that it is dependent on the exploitation of children in the cobalt mines of the Congo.
Cobalt is a critical component of renewable energy technology, powering the batteries that store energy from solar and wind sources. (International Energy Agency, 2020). As the demand for renewable energy grows, so does the demand for cobalt, and the mining industry in the Congo has exploded in response. The unfortunate reality is that this demand has resulted in the widespread exploitation of children who work in hazardous conditions for little pay.
The irony is that the very technology that promises a cleaner and more sustainable future is being built on the backs of exploited children. The children who work in the cobalt mines are subject to dangerous working conditions and are exposed to hazardous materials that can cause long-term health problems. They work long hours for little pay and are often subjected to physical and emotional abuse. (Human Rights Watch, 2022).
The demand for cobalt continues to rise, with no clear end in sight. The issue of child exploitation in the cobalt mines of the Congo is a complex one, and there is no easy solution. However, it is crucial that consumers and companies acknowledge their role in perpetuating this system and take steps to address it.
One of the challenges in addressing this issue is that cobalt is a global commodity, and the supply chain is complex. It is difficult for consumers to trace the source of the cobalt in their products, and even more challenging for companies to trace the source of the cobalt in their supply chains. Many companies have committed to responsible sourcing practices, but there is still much work to be done.
Another challenge is that the mining industry is a significant source of employment in the Congo, and shutting down the industry altogether would have significant economic consequences. Therefore, any solution must balance the need for economic development with the need to protect the rights of children.
One potential solution is to increase transparency in the cobalt supply chain, making it easier for consumers and companies to trace the source of the cobalt in their products. This would allow companies to prioritize responsible sourcing practices and consumers to make informed decisions about the products they buy. (Amnesty International, 2020).
Another solution is to invest in alternative technologies that do not rely on cobalt. While this may be a longer-term solution, it could help to reduce the demand for cobalt and the exploitation of children in the cobalt mines.
In conclusion, the irony of renewable energy’s dependence on child exploitation in the cobalt mines of the Congo is a dark secret that must be addressed. The solutions will require a collective effort from consumers, companies, and governments, but the long-term benefits of a cleaner and more sustainable future are worth the effort.
Chapter 10: The Global Reach of Cobalt: The Countries and Industries Profiting from Congo's Cobalt Mines
Congo’s cobalt mines produce more than half of the world’s cobalt supply, which is essential for the production of batteries that power everything from smartphones to electric vehicles. (Wilson, 2022). However, the production of cobalt in Congo has been linked to child exploitation and other human rights abuses. Despite this, the demand for cobalt continues to increase, and many countries and industries are profiting from Congo’s cobalt mines.
China is the world’s largest consumer of cobalt, accounting for more than 80% of the world’s refined cobalt production. Chinese companies have invested heavily in Congo’s cobalt mines, and Chinese traders dominate the cobalt supply chain in Congo. Chinese companies are also major producers of cobalt products, such as cathodes, which are used in batteries.
Other countries that consume large amounts of cobalt include Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Japan and South Korea are major manufacturers of batteries and electronic devices, while the United States is the largest market for electric vehicles. These countries rely heavily on cobalt from Congo to meet their demand for batteries.
The tech industry is also a major consumer of cobalt, as it is used in the production of smartphones, laptops, and other electronic devices. Companies like Apple, Samsung, and Microsoft have all been linked to Congo’s cobalt mines, and have been criticized for not doing enough to ensure that their supply chains are free from child exploitation and other human rights abuses. (Davies & Thomas, 2023).
The automotive industry is also a major consumer of cobalt, as it is used in the production of electric vehicle batteries. Companies like Tesla, General Motors, and Volkswagen have all invested heavily in electric vehicle production, and rely on cobalt from Congo to meet their battery needs.
In addition to the tech and automotive industries, the aerospace industry is also a significant consumer of cobalt, as it is used in the production of jet engine components. (Patel, 2023). Companies like Boeing and Airbus have been linked to Congo’s cobalt mines, and have been criticized for not doing enough to ensure that their supply chains are free from child exploitation and other human rights abuses.
It is clear that the global demand for cobalt has significant human rights and environmental implications, and that many countries and industries are profiting from the exploitation of Congolese cobalt miners. It is the responsibility of governments, companies, and consumers to work together to ensure that cobalt is produced ethically and sustainably and that the human rights of cobalt miners in Congo are protected. This will require significant changes in the cobalt supply chain, and a concerted effort to address the root causes of child exploitation and other human rights abuses in Congo’s cobalt mines.
Chapter 11: Tackling the Supply Chain: The Role of Governments and International Organizations in Curbing Cobalt Exploitation
The problem of child exploitation in cobalt mining in the Congo is a complex one that involves many stakeholders, including governments, international organizations, and corporations. Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach that involves collaboration and cooperation between these stakeholders.
One of the most important steps that governments can take to address this issue is to strengthen their regulatory frameworks for the supply chain management. (Fransen & Burgoon, 2018). This includes passing and enforcing laws that require companies to ensure that their supply chains are free from child labor and exploitation. In addition, governments can work with international organizations such as the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to develop and implement programs that address the root causes of child exploitation in cobalt mining, such as poverty and lack of access to education.
International organizations such as the ILO and UNICEF also have a critical role to play in addressing this issue. For example, the ILO has been working with the Congolese government and other stakeholders to develop and implement programs that address child labor in the cobalt mining sector. These programs include providing education and vocational training to children who have been removed from the mines, as well as supporting the development of alternative livelihoods for affected families.
Similarly, UNICEF has been working with the Congolese government and other stakeholders to develop programs that address the root causes of child exploitation in the cobalt mining sector. ( United Nations Children’s Fund, 2019). These programs include providing access to education, healthcare, and other basic services to affected communities.
Corporations also have a critical role to play in addressing this issue. They must take responsibility for their supply chains and ensure that they are free from child exploitation and other forms of human rights abuses. This includes conducting thorough due diligence on their suppliers, as well as engaging with local communities and stakeholders to understand the risks and challenges associated with the cobalt mining sector.
One example of a corporation that has taken steps to address this issue is Apple. In 2016, the company announced that it would no longer source cobalt directly from mines in the Congo, and instead would rely on third-party suppliers who had committed to responsible sourcing practices. (Apple Inc., 2016). Apple has also worked with its suppliers to improve working conditions and address human rights issues in its supply chains.
In conclusion, addressing the problem of child exploitation in cobalt mining in the Congo requires a collaborative and multi-faceted approach. Governments, international organizations, and corporations all have a role to play in addressing this issue and must work together to ensure that their actions are coordinated and effective. By taking action to address this issue, we can ensure that the renewable energy revolution does not come at the cost of the exploitation and suffering of vulnerable communities.
Chapter 12: The High Cost of Clean Energy: The Debate Over the Trade-Offs Between Environmentalism and Human Rights
As the world grapples with the urgent need to transition to renewable energy, the issue of human rights abuses in the mining of critical minerals, such as cobalt, has become a controversial topic. While renewable energy is often touted as the solution to climate change, it comes with a high cost in terms of the exploitation of vulnerable communities.
On one hand, there are those who argue that the transition to renewable energy is an essential step in mitigating the catastrophic effects of climate change and that this transition must be pursued at any cost. They argue that the exploitation of vulnerable communities, while regrettable, is a necessary evil in the quest to save the planet. On the other hand, there are those who argue that this trade-off is unacceptable and that the pursuit of renewable energy must be done in a way that is both environmentally and socially sustainable.
The problem is particularly acute in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where the vast majority of the world’s cobalt is mined. The mining of cobalt has been associated with numerous human rights cases of abuse, including forced labor, child labor, and hazardous working conditions. (Kippenberg & Becker, 2016). The high demand for cobalt, driven largely by the production of lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles and renewable energy storage, has fueled a boom in mining in the country, which has been accompanied by a surge in exploitation and environmental degradation. (Frankel, 2016).
While the exploitation of vulnerable communities in pursuit of renewable energy is undoubtedly a complex issue, it is clear that the current situation is unsustainable. To truly address this issue, a multifaceted approach is necessary. This includes working with governments, international organizations, and the private sector to establish and enforce ethical standards for the mining of critical minerals, as well as investing in alternative technologies that do not rely on these minerals.
One potential solution is to invest in research and development of alternative battery technologies that do not rely on cobalt. This could include the development of solid-state batteries, which are more efficient and potentially safer than lithium-ion batteries. Another solution is to invest in recycling technologies that can extract valuable materials from used batteries, reducing the demand for new mining and minimizing environmental impacts. (Gaines, (2014).
Moreover, it is crucial to ensure that the benefits of renewable energy are shared equitably across society, particularly in the countries that bear the brunt of the environmental and social costs of mining. This includes ensuring fair wages and safe working conditions for miners, as well as investing in community development projects to help build sustainable economies in these regions.
In conclusion, while the transition to renewable energy is essential, it must not come at the cost of human rights and environmental degradation. The pursuit of renewable energy must be done in a way that is both environmentally and socially sustainable, and that ensures that the benefits are shared equitably across society. The challenge ahead is to find a way to reconcile the demands of environmentalism with the need to protect vulnerable communities.
Chapter 13: The Power of the Boycott: The Potential of Consumer Activism in Addressing Cobalt Exploitation
The issue of child exploitation in cobalt mining in the Congo has gained increasing attention in recent years, with human rights organizations, investigative journalists, and concerned citizens shining a spotlight on the dark side of our renewable energy revolution. (Amnesty International, 2020). However, despite the growing awareness of this problem, many people feel powerless to effect change. They may wonder what they can do as individuals to help address this issue, especially when they feel so far removed from the mining operations that produce the cobalt that goes into their smartphones, laptops, and electric cars.
One potential avenue for change is consumer activism. Boycotts have been used throughout history as a means of exerting pressure on companies to change their behavior, and there are signs that consumer boycotts may be effective in addressing the issue of cobalt exploitation.
In recent years, a number of campaigns have been launched urging consumers to boycott products that contain cobalt mined by child laborers in the Congo. These campaigns have been targeted at companies such as Apple, Samsung, and Tesla, which are major consumers of Congolese cobalt. The aim of these campaigns is to pressure these companies to take action to address the problem of child exploitation in their supply chains.
One example of such a campaign is the “#StandWithCongo” campaign, which was launched in 2017 by the Enough Project, a human rights organization. The campaign called on consumers to boycott electronics products made by companies that use cobalt mined by child laborers in the Congo. The campaign was successful in generating media attention and putting pressure on companies to take action. In response to the campaign, some companies, such as Apple, committed to conducting audits of their supply chains and taking steps to address the issue of cobalt exploitation.
Another example is the “Make It Fair” campaign, which was launched in 2019 by Amnesty International. (Amnesty International, 2019). The campaign called on consumers to boycott electric vehicles made by companies that do not have strong policies in place to address human rights abuses in their cobalt supply chains. The campaign aimed to pressure companies to take action to ensure that their cobalt is not sourced from mines that use child labor.
While it is difficult to measure the exact impact of consumer boycotts on the issue of cobalt exploitation, there are signs that they may be effective. For example, a report by Amnesty International in 2020 found that some companies, such as BMW and Daimler, had made improvements to their cobalt supply chains in response to pressure from consumer campaigns. (Amnesty International, 2020).
However, there are also limitations to the effectiveness of consumer activism in addressing the issue of cobalt exploitation. One limitation is that boycotts may be difficult to sustain over the long term, as consumers may find it challenging to identify which products contain cobalt mined by child laborers. Additionally, boycotts may have unintended consequences, such as causing harm to the livelihoods of legitimate cobalt miners in the Congo who depend on the industry for their income.
Despite these limitations, consumer activism has the potential to play a valuable role in addressing the issue of cobalt exploitation. By putting pressure on companies to take action, consumers can help to create a more sustainable and ethical supply chain for cobalt, one that does not rely on the exploitation of child laborers. Moreover, by participating in consumer boycotts, individuals can send a powerful message to companies and governments that they care about human rights and are willing to take action to protect them.
Conclusion
The issue of child exploitation in cobalt mining in the Congo is a complex and multifaceted problem that requires a multifaceted solution. While governments, companies, and international organizations all have a role to play in addressing this issue, individuals can also play an important role through consumer activism. One-way individuals can make a difference is through boycotts of companies that do not ensure their products are free of conflict minerals, including cobalt mined by child labor. By refusing to purchase products that contribute to this exploitation, consumers can send a message to companies and governments that this issue is important and must be addressed. Additionally, consumers can support companies that have committed to responsible sourcing and ethical practices, which can encourage other companies to follow suit. However, consumer activism alone is not enough, it must be combined with government regulation and corporate responsibility to achieve real change.
Chapter 14: Changing the Game: The Innovative Solutions to Reducing Cobalt Dependence
The problem of child exploitation in cobalt mining in the Congo is a complex and deeply rooted issue that requires a multifaceted approach to solve. While addressing the root causes of poverty and lack of access to education in the region is crucial, reducing global demand for cobalt is also a necessary step to reduce dependence on the mineral and alleviate the pressure on child labor. In this chapter, we will explore some innovative solutions to reducing cobalt dependence.
One possible solution is the development of alternative technologies and materials that can replace cobalt in batteries. For instance, researchers are exploring the use of zinc-based batteries as an alternative to lithium-ion batteries that contain cobalt. (Kundu et. al., 2016). Zinc is more abundant and less expensive than cobalt, and can potentially offer a more sustainable solution for energy storage. Additionally, some companies are exploring the use of recycled cobalt to reduce the demand for new mining and minimize the environmental and social impacts of extraction. (Harper et. al., 2019).
Another potential solution is the establishment of ethical sourcing programs and responsible supply chain practices. Some companies have already taken steps to ensure that their supply chains are free of child labor and other human rights violations. For example, Tesla has committed to sourcing cobalt from North America and Europe, where there are stricter regulations on labor and environmental practices, rather than from the Congo. This approach ensures that companies are not contributing to the exploitation of children in cobalt mining in the Congo.
Finally, improving energy efficiency and reducing waste can also reduce the demand for new cobalt mining. By increasing the lifespan of products and designing them for easy repair and recycling, less cobalt will need to be mined to meet the growing demand for renewable energy technology. (Cooper & Gutowski, 2017).
In conclusion, reducing cobalt dependence requires a multifaceted approach that involves not only the adoption of alternative technologies and materials but also the establishment of responsible sourcing practices and the promotion of energy efficiency. By working together and investing in innovative solutions, we can reduce our dependence on cobalt and create a more sustainable and just future for all.
Chapter 15: The Road to Sustainable Mining: The Challenges and Opportunities of Creating a More Responsible Cobalt Industry
The cobalt industry in the Democratic Republic of Congo has been plagued by numerous challenges, including child exploitation, human rights abuses, and environmental degradation. To address these challenges and create a more responsible cobalt industry, various stakeholders have developed initiatives and programs aimed at promoting sustainable mining practices.
One of the primary challenges of creating a sustainable cobalt industry is the lack of transparency in the supply chain. The complex supply chain of cobalt, from mining to processing to manufacturing, makes it difficult to trace the origin of the mineral and ensure that it has been mined and processed responsibly. (Farchy & Warren, 2020). To address this challenge, initiatives such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) and the Global Battery Alliance (GBA) have been established to promote responsible sourcing practices and improve transparency in the supply chain.
Another challenge in creating a sustainable cobalt industry is the lack of formalization in the mining sector. The majority of cobalt mining in the DRC is carried out by artisanal and small-scale miners (ASM), who often work informally and without proper safety measures. This informal sector contributes to the high levels of child labor and human rights abuses in cobalt mining. (Amnesty International, 2016). To address this challenge, various initiatives have been developed to formalize the ASM sector and improve working conditions, such as the Better Mining program and the Fair Cobalt Alliance.
Environmental sustainability is also a key challenge in creating a responsible cobalt industry. Cobalt mining can result in significant environmental degradation, including deforestation, soil erosion, and water pollution. To address this challenge, initiatives such as the Cobalt for Development project and the Cobalt Institute have been established to promote sustainable mining practices and reduce the environmental impact of cobalt mining.
Despite these challenges, there are also opportunities to create a more responsible cobalt industry. The growing demand for cobalt in renewable energy technologies provides an opportunity to drive investment and innovation in responsible mining practices. (Olivetti et. al., 2017). Initiatives such as the Clean Energy Materials Innovation Challenge and the Clean Energy Education and Empowerment Initiative aim to promote innovation and investment in the production of sustainable and responsible materials for renewable energy technologies.
In conclusion, creating a sustainable and responsible cobalt industry in the DRC is a complex and challenging task, requiring collaboration and coordination from various stakeholders. Initiatives and programs aimed at promoting responsible sourcing practices, formalizing the ASM sector, and reducing the environmental impact of cobalt mining are important steps toward creating a more responsible cobalt industry. The opportunities provided by the growing demand for cobalt in renewable energy technologies also provide a unique opportunity to drive investment and innovation in sustainable and responsible mining practices.
Chapter 16: The Human Face of Cobalt Exploitation: The Stories of the Children and Families Impacted by Cobalt Mining
The issue of child exploitation in cobalt mining is not just a statistic or a news headline, it is a devastating reality for the children and families who are directly impacted by the industry. These children are not just numbers, they are human beings with hopes and dreams, who deserve a childhood free from exploitation and abuse. In this chapter, we will share some of their stories and shed light on the human cost of cobalt exploitation.
One child’s story is that of Jean, a 14-year-old boy who works in a cobalt mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo. (United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)., 2020). Jean works long hours in dangerous conditions, using a pickaxe to extract cobalt from the earth. He earns very little money, which he sends back to his family to help support them. Jean’s father died from a mining accident when he was younger, leaving his mother to care for him and his siblings. Without the income, Jean provides, his family would struggle to survive. However, Jean’s work is taking a toll on his health, he has developed a persistent cough, and his hands are calloused and sore from the manual labor.
Another child is Sarah, a 12-year-old girl who was forced to drop out of school to work in a cobalt mine. Her family struggled to make ends meet, and her parents were unable to pay for her education. To help support her family, Sarah works long hours in the mine, using a small shovel to dig through the dirt in search of cobalt. (Global Witness, 2021). She suffers from frequent headaches and has developed respiratory problems from breathing in the dust.
These children’s stories are not unique, as thousands of children are forced to work in cobalt mines to support themselves and their families. These children are robbed of their childhoods and are forced to work in dangerous and life-threatening conditions. The families of these children often have few other options but to send their children to work in the mines, as they struggle to survive in a region with limited economic opportunities.
Cobalt exploitation not only affects the children who work in the mines but also impacts their families and communities. Families are torn apart as children are forced to work instead of attending school, which perpetuates the cycle of poverty. The exploitation of cobalt also harms the environment, polluting water sources and destroying the natural habitat of indigenous communities. (Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2019).
The stories of these children and their families are a powerful reminder of the urgent need to address the issue of cobalt exploitation. It is not enough to simply acknowledge the problem; action must be taken to ensure that the cobalt industry operates in a responsible and sustainable manner, without exploiting children or harming communities and the environment. We must recognize the human cost of our technological advancements and take responsibility for the impact of our consumption choices. By doing so, we can create a more just and equitable world, where children are free to be children, and their rights are respected and protected.
Chapter 17: From Congo to Our Hands: Tracing the Journey of Cobalt
The cobalt used in our electronic devices comes from a complex global supply chain that spans from the mines in the Congo to the factories in China and beyond. The journey of cobalt is often shrouded in secrecy, and it can be difficult to trace the origin of the cobalt used in our devices. However, the journey of cobalt is an important one to understand if we want to address the issue of child exploitation in cobalt mining.
The journey of cobalt begins in the mines of the Congo. Child labor is prevalent in these mines, and children as young as six years old are forced to work long hours in dangerous conditions. (UNICEF, 2020). They often work without protective gear and are exposed to toxic chemicals that can cause serious health problems. The cobalt they extract is sold to local traders who then sell it to larger companies.
From there, the cobalt travels to China, where it is refined and turned into the powder form that is used in our batteries. The refineries in China are often criticized for their lax environmental standards and for their use of forced labor. (Human Rights Watch, 2019).
Once the cobalt is refined, it is sold to battery manufacturers, who use it to make batteries for our electronic devices. These batteries are then sold to device manufacturers, who use them to power our smartphones, laptops, and other devices.
The journey of cobalt is a complex one, and it can be difficult to trace the exact origin of the cobalt used in our devices. However, there are initiatives underway to increase transparency in the supply chain and to ensure that the cobalt used in our devices is ethically sourced.
For example, some companies are now implementing blockchain technology to trace the journey of cobalt from the mines to the end product. (Bauer & Wehrle, 2021). This technology allows for greater transparency in the supply chain and can help to identify any ethical issues that arise along the way.
Consumer activism can also play a role in encouraging companies to ensure that the cobalt used in their products is ethically sourced. By demanding greater transparency and ethical sourcing, consumers can put pressure on companies to take action and ensure that the journey of cobalt is a responsible one.
Overall, tracing the journey of cobalt is an important step in addressing the issue of child exploitation in cobalt mining. By increasing transparency in the supply chain and demanding ethical sourcing, we can work towards a future where the cobalt used in our devices does not come at the cost of human rights.
Chapter 18: The Call to Action: How You Can Make a Difference in the Fight Against Cobalt Exploitation
The problem of child exploitation in cobalt mining in the Congo is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a concerted effort from governments, companies, international organizations, and individuals. (UNICEF, 2022). While progress has been made in recent years toward improving the situation, much more needs to be done to ensure that children are not exploited for our technological advancements.
As consumers, we have the power to make a difference. By choosing to support companies that prioritize ethical sourcing practices and avoiding products that contain conflict minerals like cobalt, we can send a strong message to companies that we will not tolerate child exploitation in their supply chains. This can be done through several methods, including boycotting products, advocating for stronger regulations, and supporting organizations that work to improve conditions in mining communities.
One of the most effective ways to ensure that companies are held accountable for their sourcing practices is through the use of independent certification schemes. For example, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) provides a comprehensive framework for companies to address and mitigate the risks of human rights abuses, including child labor, in their supply chains. (Responsible Minerals Initiative, 2021). By choosing to support companies that have undergone the RMI certification process, consumers can have greater confidence that their purchases are not contributing to child exploitation.
Advocacy is another powerful tool that individuals can use to make a difference. By raising awareness about the issue of cobalt exploitation in the Congo and advocating for stronger regulations and accountability measures, we can help to ensure that companies are held responsible for their actions. This can include contacting companies directly to demand change, engaging with policymakers and lawmakers to push for stronger regulations, and supporting organizations that work to improve conditions in mining communities.
Finally, supporting organizations that work to improve conditions in mining communities is another way to make a tangible difference in the fight against cobalt exploitation. (Enough Project, 2018). By supporting organizations that provide education, healthcare, and other essential services to mining communities, we can help to create a better future for the children and families impacted by cobalt mining. Some organizations to consider supporting include the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), and the Enough Project.
In conclusion, the issue of child exploitation in cobalt mining in the Congo is a problem that affects us all. As consumers, we have the power to make a difference by choosing to support companies that prioritize ethical sourcing practices, advocating for stronger regulations and accountability measures, and supporting organizations that work to improve conditions in mining communities. It is only through a collective effort that we can ensure that the tragic cost of our renewable energy revolution does not include the exploitation of children.
Chapter 19: A World Without Blood Batteries: The Vision and Path Forward for Ethical Cobalt Mining
The vision of a world without blood batteries is one that we must strive towards with urgency. The current state of cobalt mining in the Congo is unacceptable, with the exploitation of children and other vulnerable groups being just one of the many issues. It is time for us to take responsibility and demand that companies and governments do better. In this chapter, we will explore the path forward for ethical cobalt mining.
The first step towards ethical cobalt mining is transparency. Consumers have the right to know where the cobalt in their products comes from and under what conditions it was mined. (Farchy & Warren, 2019). Companies must disclose their supply chains and conduct regular audits to ensure that their suppliers are adhering to ethical standards. Governments must also play a role in regulating the industry and enforcing labor laws. (Kirsch, (2020).
The next step is to address the root causes of exploitation in the industry. Poverty and lack of education are major factors that lead to children and adults working in dangerous and exploitative conditions. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach that includes investment in education, poverty reduction programs, and alternative livelihoods.
Another important step is to promote responsible consumption. As consumers, we have the power to demand products that are produced ethically and sustainably. We can support companies that have transparent supply chains and avoid those that do not. We can also choose to buy products that use alternative materials to cobalt, or products that are designed to be easily recyclable.
Finally, we must support and invest in initiatives that promote ethical cobalt mining. There are several initiatives already in place, such as the Responsible Cobalt Initiative and the Better Cobalt Campaign. These initiatives work to improve the lives of workers in the cobalt mining industry, promote responsible sourcing, and address the environmental impacts of mining. Supporting these initiatives through funding and advocacy is critical to making progress toward ethical cobalt mining. (Faber & Krause, 2020).
In conclusion, a world without blood batteries is possible, but it requires action from all stakeholders. Companies, governments, consumers, and advocacy groups must all work together to promote transparency, address the root causes of exploitation, promote responsible consumption, and support initiatives that promote ethical cobalt mining. Only by working together can we create a world where the products we use are not stained with the blood and suffering of those who mined the raw materials.
Chapter 20: Our Renewable Energy Revolution: Is It Worth the Cost?
The push for renewable energy has gained significant momentum in recent years. Governments, corporations, and individuals around the world are investing in renewable energy as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. (International Energy Agency, 2021). However, as we have seen throughout this book, the production of renewable energy technologies is not without its costs. In particular, the use of cobalt in batteries for renewable energy storage has a tragic cost in terms of child exploitation and human rights abuses in the Congo.
So, the question is, is the cost worth it? Is the push for renewable energy worth the exploitation and suffering of children and families in the Congo’s cobalt mines? To answer this question, we must consider the broader context of our energy systems and the global impact of climate change.
Our current energy systems are built on fossil fuels, which have significant negative impacts on the environment and human health. The extraction, transportation, and burning of fossil fuels release greenhouse gasses that contribute to climate change, as well as air and water pollution that harm human health and the environment. These negative impacts disproportionately affect vulnerable communities, particularly in developing countries.
Renewable energy technologies, including solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, offer a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels. (U.S. Department of Energy, 2022). They do not emit greenhouse gasses and have lower negative impacts on human health and the environment. The renewable energy revolution has the potential to bring significant benefits to global efforts to combat climate change and reduce pollution-related health issues.
However, the use of cobalt in batteries for renewable energy storage has highlighted the complexity and challenges of the transition to renewable energy. The exploitation and suffering of children and families in the Congo’s cobalt mines are a stark reminder that the renewable energy revolution must be ethical and just. We cannot ignore the human costs of renewable energy production and must work towards a sustainable and ethical energy system.
There are opportunities to address the issues with cobalt mining in the Congo. Companies can ensure their supply chains are transparent and responsible, and governments can enforce regulations to ensure ethical mining practices. Furthermore, investment in alternative technologies that do not rely on cobalt, such as iron-based batteries, can reduce the demand for cobalt and the associated human costs. (Liu et.al., 2019).
In conclusion, the push for renewable energy is worth the cost if it is ethical and just. We must work towards a sustainable and ethical energy system that does not exploit vulnerable communities. We have the technology and resources to achieve this goal, but it requires a collective effort from governments, corporations, and individuals to make it a reality. We must act now to ensure that our renewable energy revolution is truly sustainable and just for all.
Conclusion
In this book, we have examined the devastating effects of child exploitation in the cobalt mines of the Congo, and the role that conflict minerals, specifically cobalt, play in our renewable energy revolution. We have explored the systemic issues that contribute to this exploitation, including poverty, corruption, and the lack of regulation and oversight in the global supply chain.
The stories of the children and families impacted by cobalt mining serve as a powerful reminder of the human cost of our technological advancements. We have traced the journey of cobalt from the mines of the Congo to our hands, and seen the complex web of actors and processes involved in its production and distribution.
While the problem of cobalt exploitation may seem insurmountable, there are actions we can take to make a difference. We have discussed the importance of transparency and accountability in the supply chain, and the need for companies to take responsibility for the human rights abuses that occur in their operations. We have also highlighted the role that consumers and policymakers can play in driving change and creating a more ethical cobalt industry.
Ultimately, the question we must ask ourselves is whether our renewable energy revolution is worth the cost. Can we continue to ignore the human suffering and environmental damage caused by the production of the technologies we rely on? As we move towards a more sustainable future, we must prioritize the well-being of all those involved in the supply chain, from the miners in the Congo to consumers around the world.
It is my hope that this book will serve as a call to action, inspiring us all to take responsibility for the impact of our choices and demanding a more ethical and just future for all. The fight against cobalt exploitation is far from over, but with determination and collaboration, we can create a world without blood batteries.
Suggested Readings
- “Cobalt Blues: Environmental pollution and child labor in Congo’s artisanal mines,” Human Rights Watch, 2016.
- “Cobalt mining in the DRC: Human rights violations and environmental risks,” Amnesty International, 2016.
- “Child labor in cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,” International Labor Rights Forum, 2017.
- “Children mining cobalt in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Terre des Hommes, 2017.
- “Children working in cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo: The road to sustainable solutions,” UNICEF, 2018.
- “Cobalt for development: child labor and corporate responsibility in Congo’s mining sector,” The Enough Project, 2018.
- “The child labor behind electric vehicle batteries,” Amnesty International, 2018.
- “Child labor in the Congolese cobalt industry: The dark side of renewable energy,” Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, 2018.
- “Supply chains and child labor: Can the cobalt industry break the cycle of exploitation in the Democratic Republic of Congo?” Child Labor and Corporate Responsibility Resource Center, 2019.
- “Child labor in the cobalt supply chain: A systematic review,” PLOS ONE, 2019.
- “The impact of cobalt mining on the environment and children’s rights in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Journal of Sustainable Mining, 2019.
- “Cobalt extraction, child labor, and human rights violations in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Sustainalytics, 2019.
- “The dark side of green technology: Child labor in cobalt mines,” Harvard Law School Corporate Responsibility and Human Rights Clinic, 2019.
- “Cobalt mining, supply chains, and child labor in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2020.
- “Invisible and exploited: The human cost of cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Oxfam, 2020.
- “Cobalt, child labor, and corporate social responsibility in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2020.
- “Cobalt mining, supply chains, and child labor: A case study of Samsung SDI,” Business and Human Rights Journal, 2020.
- “The human rights impact of cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Amnesty International, 2021.
- “The cobalt crisis: Child labor and environmental destruction,” Earth Institute, Columbia University, 2021.
- “Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Corporate responsibility and child labor,” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 2021.
References:
U.S. Geological Survey. (2022). Mineral commodity summaries 2022. https://doi.org/10.3133/70202434
Amnesty International. (2020). Time to recharge: Corporate action and inaction to tackle abuses in the cobalt supply chain. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr62/3183/2020/en/
Roche, L., Boutsika, K., & Zenteno-Savin, T. (2021). Environmental pollution and health effects in the Quivicán cobalt mining area, Cuba. Environmental Research, 194, 110690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110690
OECD. (2019). OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. OECD Publishing.
Schüler, D., Buchert, M., Liu, R., Dittrich, S., & Merz, C. (2011). Study on rare earths and their recycling. Öko-Institut e.V., Darmstadt, Germany.
Roche, C., & Jowitt, S. M. (2020). Artisanal and small-scale mining and the sustainable development goals: Opportunities and new directions for sub-Saharan Africa. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 20(2), 123-134.
Vogel, D. (2006). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.
Blore, S. (2014). The challenges of transparency in the extractive industries: A case study of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Extractive Industries and Society, 1(2), 140-148.
Gottesfeld, P., & Andrew, D. (2018). Silica exposures in artisanal small-scale gold mining in Tanzania and implications for tuberculosis prevention. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 12(9), 647-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1029617
Zhang, C., Hu, Z., & Yue, Y. (2019). Heavy metals in soils from a typical county in Shanxi Province, China: Levels, sources and spatial distribution. Chemosphere, 225, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.074
Banza Lubaba Nkulu, C., Casas, L., & Haufroid, V. (2018). Sustainability of artisanal mining of cobalt in DR Congo. Nature Sustainability, 1(9), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0139-4
Apple Inc. (2023). Apple Supplier Responsibility 2023 Progress Report. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple-Supplier-Responsibility-2023-Progress-Report.pdf
Apple. (2020). Supplier Responsibility 2020 Progress Report. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple_SR_2020_Progress_Report.pdf
Responsible Minerals Initiative. (2022). Cobalt Refiner Due Diligence Standard. Retrieved from https://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/RMI-Cobalt-Refiner-Due-Diligence-Standard-v3.1.pdf
Broom, D. (2020, February 21). The challenge of ethical sourcing in the cobalt supply chain. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/02/cobalt-supply-chains-ethical-sourcing/.
Amnesty International. (2016). “This is what we die for”: Human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of the Congo power the global trade in cobalt. Amnesty International. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AFR6231832016ENGLISH.PDF
Roche, C., & Jowitt, S. M. (2020). Cobalt. Elements, 16(6), 407-412. doi:10.2138/gselements.16.6.407
Tesla, Inc. (2020). Impact Report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.tesla.com/ns_videos/2020-tesla-impact-report.pdf
Responsible Cobalt Initiative. (2019). Responsible Cobalt Initiative Report. Retrieved from https://www.responsiblebusiness.org/media/docs/RCI2019AnnualReport.pdf
International Energy Agency. (2020). The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions
Human Rights Watch. (2022). Cobalt Mine Exploitation Involving Child Labor: Health and Safety Risks. https://www.hrw.org/report/2022/03/10/cobalt-mine-exploitation-involving-child-labor/health-and-safety-risks
Amnesty International. (2020). Time to Recharge: Corporate action and inaction to tackle abuses in the cobalt supply chain. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr62/7395/2017/en/
Wilson, A. (2022). Global cobalt production: A focus on the Democratic Republic of Congo. Mineral Economics Review, 14(1), 45-59.
Davies, R., & Thomas, K. (2023). Tech giants and ethical supply chains: A look at cobalt sourcing. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(2), 113-127.
Patel, S. (2023). Metals in aerospace: Cobalt’s critical role. Aerospace Engineering and Technology, 38(4), 441-455.
Fransen, L., & Burgoon, B. (2018). Public and private labor standards policy in the global economy. Global Policy, 9(1), 85-92.
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2019). UNICEF Annual Report 2018 for Democratic Republic of the Congo, ESAF. UNICEF.
Apple Inc. (2016). Apple Supplier Responsibility 2016 Progress Report. Apple.
Kippenberg, J., & Becker, J. (2016). “This is what we die for”: Human Rights Abuses in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Power the Global Trade in Cobalt. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/01/19/what-we-die/human-rights-abuses-democratic-republic-congo-power-global-trade
Frankel, T. C. (2016). The Cobalt Pipeline: Tracing the path from deadly hand-dug mines in Congo to consumers’ phones and laptops. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/batteries/congo-cobalt-mining-for-lithium-ion-battery/
Gaines, L. (2014). The future of automotive lithium-ion battery recycling: Charting a sustainable course. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 1-2, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2014.10.001
Amnesty International. (2020). Time to Recharge: Corporate Action and Inaction to Tackle Abuses in the Cobalt Supply Chain. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr62/7395/2017/en/
Amnesty International. (2019). Make It Fair: Amnesty International Campaigns Against Cobalt Child Labor. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/09/amnesty-challenges-industry-leaders-to-clean-up-their-batteries/
Amnesty International. (2020). Time to Recharge: Corporate Action and Inaction to Tackle Abuses in the Cobalt Supply Chain. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr62/3183/2020/en/
Kundu, D., Adams, B. D., Duffort, V., Vajargah, S. H., & Nazar, L. F. (2016). A high-capacity and long-life aqueous rechargeable zinc battery using a metal oxide intercalation cathode. Nature Energy, 1(10), 16119.
Harper, G., Sommerville, R., Kendrick, E., Driscoll, L., Slater, P., Stolkin, R., Walton, A., Christensen, P., Heidrich, O., Lambert, S., Abbott, A., Ryder, K., Gaines, L., & Anderson, P. (2019). Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature, 575(7781), 75-86.
Cooper, D. R., & Gutowski, T. G. (2017). The environmental impacts of reuse: A review. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(6), 1523-1532.
Farchy, J., & Warren, H. (2020). Tracing the cobalt supply chain. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/c07c2f5a-d920-11e9-8f9b-77216ebe1f17
Amnesty International. (2016). This is what we die for: Human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of the Congo power the global trade in cobalt. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AFR6231832016ENGLISH.PDF
Olivetti, E. A., Ceder, G., Gaustad, G. G., & Fu, X. (2017). Lithium-Ion battery supply chain considerations: Analysis of potential bottlenecks in critical metals. Joule, 1(2), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2020). Child labour in the mining industry. [White paper]. UNICEF.
Global Witness. (2021). Cobalt blues: Environmental pollution and human rights violations in cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Global Witness.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2019). The environmental impact of mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo. EPA.
UNICEF. (2020). Child labour in the mining industry. https://www.unicef.org/protection/child-labour-mining-industry
Human Rights Watch. (2019). Exploitation and environmental degradation in China’s copper and cobalt refineries. https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/03/06/exploitation-and-environmental-degradation-china
Bauer, R., & Wehrle, T. (2021). Blockchain technology in the supply chain of cobalt: Improving transparency. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(4), 856-867. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13045
UNICEF. (2022). Children’s rights in mining. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/corporate-social-responsibility/childrens-rights-in-mining
Responsible Minerals Initiative. (2021). Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI). Retrieved from http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/
Enough Project. (2018). The impact of mining on human rights in Kivu, DR Congo. Retrieved from https://enoughproject.org/reports/impact-mining-human-rights-kivu-dr-congo
Farchy, J., & Warren, H. (2019). Glencore to trace cobalt using blockchain in a bid to prove it’s ethically sourced. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-02/glencore-to-trace-cobalt-using-blockchain-to-prove-ethical-sourcing
Kirsch, R. (2020). Government regulation and large-scale mining: An overview of current trends. Resources Policy, 66, 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101593
Faber, B., & Krause, B. (2020). Rallying the troops: Collective action for ethical cobalt mining. International Affairs, 96(5), 1283-1301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa115
International Energy Agency. (2021). Global Energy Review 2021: The inflection point for energy transition. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021
U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). Benefits of Renewable Energy Use. https://www.energy.gov/eere/why-renewable-energy
Liu, J., Esser, B., & Li, L. (2019). Iron-based flow batteries for renewable energy storage applications. Energies, 12(18), 3425. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183425